De Novo Orthopedics
Why Your Surgeon Should Be Tracking PROM After Joint Replacement — And Why Most Don't
Blog/

Why Your Surgeon Should Be Tracking PROM After Joint Replacement — And Why Most Don't

Only 25% of joint replacement patients complete functional outcome tracking at one year. CMS now mandates 50% collection by 2028 or face payment penalties. PROM isn't just a questionnaire — it's the compass that shows both surgeon and patient the full picture of recovery.

promoutcomesirehabknee-replacement

"You're Doing Great" — But Are You?

A 68-year-old patient comes in six weeks after total knee arthroplasty. The X-ray shows good implant alignment. The incision has healed. The surgeon says: "You're doing great."

But at home, this patient's knee is stiff for 30 minutes every morning. Stairs still hurt. Sleep is interrupted nightly. He doesn't know if this is normal recovery or a sign of trouble — and he won't see his surgeon again for months.

This is the fundamental gap in orthopedic post-operative care: surgeons see imaging and wounds; patients experience pain and function. PROM exists to bridge that gap.

What Is PROM?

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are standardized questionnaires completed by patients to quantify their pain, physical function, and quality of life. In orthopedics, the most common tools include:

  • KOOS, JR. (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement) — CMS-designated instrument for TKA, 7 questions
  • HOOS, JR. (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement) — CMS-designated for THA, 6 questions
  • PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) — developed by NIH, computerized adaptive testing averages just 4 questions in 45 seconds, with zero ceiling and floor effects
  • Oxford Knee Score — 12 questions, widely used in the UK and Europe

These tools turn "doing great" from a subjective impression into a trackable number.

Why PROM Matters: Evidence at Three Levels

For patients: seeing your own progress

The hardest part of rehabilitation isn't the exercises — it's the uncertainty. "Am I doing enough?" "Is this pain normal?" "Am I actually getting better?"

When patients complete PROMs regularly, they watch their scores improve over time. This is not a placebo effect. A randomized controlled trial published in JAMA Network Open found that joint replacement patients who used electronic PROM monitoring with clinical alerts showed significant improvements in health-related quality of life, fatigue, and depression[1].

For surgeons: intervening before problems escalate

10-20% of TKA patients remain dissatisfied with their surgical outcomes[2]. Traditionally, surgeons don't find out until the next clinic visit — which may be months past the optimal intervention window.

Machine learning models can now predict recovery trajectories using biopsychosocial data, achieving AUC of 0.888[3]. The key predictors: preoperative functional scores, age, comorbidity count, and — critically — preoperative mental health status.

If you collect PROMs before surgery, you can identify high-risk patients before the scalpel touches skin — and adjust rehab protocols and expectation management proactively.

Cleveland Clinic already does this, using baseline PROM profiles for risk stratification and personalized care pathways.

For healthcare systems: the gold standard for quality measurement

Imaging tells you whether the implant is loose. It cannot tell you whether a patient can squat to tie their shoes, walk through a grocery store without stopping, or sleep through the night without painkillers.

Only the patient knows these answers. PROMs standardize them, making outcomes comparable across surgeons, hospitals, and countries.

CMS 2028: The Mandate That Changes Everything

The US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has sent an unambiguous signal: PROM collection is no longer optional.

YearMilestone
July 2024Preoperative PROM data collection begins (minimum 50% of eligible patients)
2025-2026Mandatory reporting under Hospital IQR (participation and response rates made public)
FY 2028PROM results tied to annual payment — post-op collection rate must reach ≥50%
2029CMS considering mandatory MIPS Value Pathway (MVP) reporting

CMS uses KOOS, JR. (TKA) and HOOS, JR. (THA), covering all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65+ undergoing inpatient hip or knee replacement[4][5].

This isn't just an American policy. CMS sets the direction for global orthopedic quality measurement. When the world's largest single-payer ties PROM to reimbursement, other health systems follow.

The Brutal Reality: Collection Rates Are Nowhere Near Ready

The ambition is clear. The reality is sobering.

From the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) 2024 Annual Report[6]:

  • AJRR has captured 4.3 million hip and knee arthroplasty procedures across nearly 5,000 surgeons
  • But only 44% of member institutions (631/1,447) have submitted any PROM data
  • One-year post-op PROM response rates: just 25-32%

A survey of 612 AAOS members reveals the structural barriers[7]:

  • 46% of orthopedic surgeons collect PROMs, but only 35% actually use the data clinically
  • 72% cite staff burden as the primary barrier
  • 69% point to patient completion challenges
  • 47% cite cost

Paper questionnaires achieve a 9.5% completion rate. Electronic collection improves this to 53.85% — but even that barely clears the CMS 50% threshold, and only for the initial collection point.

Digital Collection Is the Only Path Forward

The barriers boil down to three words: too much friction.

For patients: traveling to a clinic to fill out a form, then doing it again months later. For nurses: reminding, distributing, collecting, entering data. For surgeons: context-free scores arriving in isolation.

The answer isn't "try harder." It's embedding PROM collection into what patients are already doing.

Text message reminders significantly boost completion rates[8]. PROMIS computerized adaptive testing needs just 4 questions and 45 seconds, with zero ceiling and floor effects[9] — meaning it captures meaningful change regardless of whether patients are in excellent or poor condition.

When PROM collection becomes "open your phone, answer 4 questions, done in 45 seconds," response rates rise naturally.

How iRehab Approaches This

iRehab is De Novo Orthopedics' response to this challenge. On the PROM layer, the design logic is:

  • Built-in PROMIS Global-10 — sent periodically via QR code, link, or email; patients complete it on their phone
  • Automatic T-score calculation — physical and mental health computed separately, benchmarked against US general population norms
  • Time-series tracking — surgeons see a trend line, not a single number
  • Integration with rehab data — PROM scores sit on the same timeline as daily exercise completion, pain ratings, and wound photos

The goal isn't to replace KOOS, JR. (which CMS will likely require), but to establish a tracking habit using shorter, more frequent PROMIS assessments — while collecting the full CMS-required instrument at key milestones (preop, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year).

In the future, when Discovery R's implantable sensors generate real-time biomechanical data, PROMs will provide the other half of the puzzle — the crosscheck between subjective experience and objective tissue forces. A patient reporting "I feel fine" while sensors detect abnormal loading patterns? That's an intervention signal.

PROM Is Not Just Another Questionnaire

At its core, PROM is a signal system:

  • For patients: objective confirmation that "I am getting better"
  • For surgeons: an early warning that "this patient needs attention"
  • For healthcare systems: evidence that "this surgery actually improved the patient's life"

In an era where enhanced recovery protocols shorten hospital stays from a week to one or two days and patients go home on Day 1, PROM is the thin thread connecting the operating room to the living room.

That thread shouldn't break the day the patient walks out the hospital door.

To learn about the full post-surgical remote care model, read 83% of Patients Want Both. To understand how implantable sensors provide objective tissue-level data, read The Sentinel Inside the Bone.

References

  1. Steinbeck V, et al. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring With Alerts for Patients Undergoing Joint Replacement. JAMA Network Open. 2023. Link

  2. Pua YH, et al. Identifying who won't benefit from total knee arthroplasty using machine learning. npj Digital Medicine. 2024. Link

  3. Biopsychosocial ML models predict improvement after TKA. Scientific Reports. 2025. Link

  4. New CMS policy mandating PROM collection for THA/TKA. 2024. PubMed

  5. AAOS resources support PROM adoption amid new CMS requirements. AAOS Now. Jan 2026. AAOS

  6. 2024 AJRR Annual Report Highlights. PMC

  7. Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection and Use Among AAOS Members. JAAOS. 2024. Link

  8. Text messaging improves PROM completion rates. 2024. PubMed

  9. Psychometric Properties and Feasibility of PROMIS CATs. JBJS. Nov 2025. Link